
There is a well balanced review of the "atheist manifesto": The God Delusion by Richard "Darwin's Rotweiller" Dawkins (a notorious God-Hater) in the most recent copy of the Christian Research Journal http://www.equip.org. It is a thorough critique written by Dr. Douglas Groothuis and a fine contrast to my simple minded analysis that follows:
1) Author is consistent with Romans 1: 18-23
For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Professing to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures.
2) Author intellectually displays a Scientific Naturalist epistemology that fails to address the subject of the Transcendent God of the Universe and displays a categorical willing ignorance to deal objectively with the Bible.
3) Author is a steamroller and demonstrates his sinful nature as an unbeliever (that is a polite way to say he is a weak whiney woosssss.)
Welcome to the readers and posters at www.greensboring.com, the home of the atheist "community" of the greater Greensboro area. Congratulations to the newly elected president!
Apologies to Dr. Douglas Groothuis for posting without permission from CRI and with scanning errors. Hopefully the correction remedies my error appropriately.
5 comments:
It looks like your scanner made numerous mistakes. Please go back and proofread this piece and correct it.
I did not make the errors in yoru posting. By the way, did you get permission from The Christian Research Journal to do this?
Doug Groothuis
Good review.
Dawkins is all rhetoric. He dismisses Christian arguments without really intellectually engaging them.
Prof Groothuis: Thanks for your comments, Communicating with CRI and proofing.
Sterling
I believe the correct spelling is "wuss." Otherwise, nice work!
"wuss"
I stand corrected.
Never thought about the correct spelling ,... searched the web and found that somebody at the dictionary.com site really does not have much to do!
thanks!
Sterling
Post a Comment